Transfer Pricing in the Digital Era – Challenges Post AI & Cloud Adoption

Why Transfer Pricing Matters in the Digital Age

Transfer Pricing (TP) refers to the rules and methods for pricing transactions between related enterprises, such as subsidiaries of a multinational enterprise (MNE). It ensures that cross-border dealings happen at arm’s length — as if they were independent parties.

Traditionally, TP was applied to goods and services like machinery, raw materials, or financing. However, in today’s digital economy, things are no longer that simple:

  • Value is often created by data, algorithms, and cloud computing.
  • Companies operate without physical presence but still earn substantial revenue from global markets.
  • Determining the right “price” for intangibles like AI, software, and intellectual property has become extremely complex.

This blog explores the unique challenges of TP in the digital era and how Indian companies must adapt.

🔹 1. Evolution of Transfer Pricing in India

  • 1991 Liberalization: With FDI inflows, India adopted transfer pricing rules to prevent profit shifting.
  • 2001: India introduced detailed TP regulations under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
  • 2010s: India began litigating heavily on royalties, management fees, and intra-group services.
  • 2016 onwards: Alignment with OECD’s BEPS framework, including Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) and Master File requirements.
  • 2020 onwards: Digital economy challenges like SaaS, e-commerce, and AI required new frameworks.

📌 Context: TP is no longer about just goods; it is about intangibles, algorithms, and digital footprints.

🔹 2. Key Challenges in the Digital Era

📍 (a) Valuing Intangibles & Data

  • Digital businesses rely on data (user preferences, search history, AI training sets).
  • Data collection may happen in one country (India), while monetization occurs in another (US).
  • How do we value user data as a TP asset?

📍 (b) AI-Driven Business Models

  • AI algorithms are developed in one jurisdiction but trained using global data.
  • Determining DEMPE functions (Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, Exploitation) becomes crucial.
  • Example: An Indian subsidiary helps enhance AI software — should profits be attributed to India or the parent entity?

📍 (c) Cloud & SaaS Transactions

  • Payments for cloud services often look like royalties or technical fees.
  • But tax treaties treat them differently.
  • Ambiguity creates litigation risk.

📍 (d) Absence of Physical Presence

  • Digital giants (e.g., Netflix, Amazon) earn billions from India without a permanent establishment (PE).
  • TP rules traditionally rely on physical presence, creating a mismatch.

🔹 3. OECD Guidance & DEMPE Approach

The OECD recommends using the DEMPE framework for intangibles:

  • Development: Who developed the AI/software?
  • Enhancement: Who improved it over time?
  • Maintenance: Who maintained and updated it?
  • Protection: Who holds legal rights (patents, IP)?
  • Exploitation: Who uses and earns from it?

Example: If an Indian subsidiary significantly enhances an AI algorithm with local data, India deserves a larger share of profits.

🔹 4. Transfer Pricing Litigation in India – Recent Trends

Indian tax authorities are aggressive in TP assessments, especially in the digital economy. Key disputes include:

  • Software Payments: Courts have debated whether payments for software licenses are royalty or business income.
  • Management Fees: Often challenged as excessive or unsubstantiated.
  • Intra-Group Services: Tax authorities demand proof of actual benefit received.

Judicial Relief: In 2024, the Supreme Court clarified that not all software payments are royalty, offering clarity to IT firms.

🔹 5. ICAI’s Role in Guiding TP Professionals

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has issued a Guidance Note on Transfer Pricing (revised 2022), which:

  • Explains TP in light of digital transactions.
  • Emphasizes robust documentation for AI, SaaS, and cloud transactions.
  • Advises Indian CAs to adopt OECD-compliant TP methods.

This guidance is critical for professionals handling complex TP audits.

🔹 6. Practical Implications for Indian Businesses

✅ IT & SaaS Companies

  • Must justify inter-company software pricing.
  • Need to document how intangibles are developed and exploited.

✅ Startups & Unicorns

  • Many Indian startups with overseas entities must align TP policies to avoid tax leakage.
  • Example: A Bengaluru startup routing ad revenue through Singapore may face scrutiny.

✅ E-commerce & Digital Giants

  • Must allocate profits fairly to India based on local user base.
  • GST and equalization levy further increase compliance.

✅ Traditional Businesses Going Digital

  • Manufacturers offering AI-driven services must rethink TP models.
  • Example: Auto companies selling connected cars with data services must allocate profits across jurisdictions.

🔹 7. Case Study – AI Subsidiary in India

Scenario:

  • US Parent develops AI software.
  • Indian Subsidiary trains it with massive Indian datasets.
  • Global profits generated from subscriptions.

Questions for TP:

  • Does India deserve compensation only for services (cost-plus) or for value creation through data?
  • Should the Indian subsidiary share in global intangible profits?

Likely Outcome: Indian tax authorities will demand a profit-split approach rather than simple cost-plus.

🔹 8. Risks of Non-Compliance

  • Tax Adjustments: Can increase taxable income by crores.
  • Double Taxation: If two countries claim the same income.
  • Penalties: Up to 200% of tax underpaid in India.
  • Reputation Damage: MNEs face scrutiny from investors and regulators.

🔹 9. FAQs – Common Questions

Q1: Are cloud payments taxable as royalty?
👉 Depends on contract terms. If ownership is transferred, yes. If only access is given, it may not be royalty.

Q2: What TP method applies to AI transactions?
👉 Often Profit Split Method (PSM) since value is shared across multiple jurisdictions.

Q3: Can startups ignore TP rules?
👉 No, even startups must comply once they cross thresholds for international transactions.

Q4: How can ICAI help professionals?
👉 ICAI’s guidance notes, courses, and diploma in international taxation equip CAs to handle complex cases.

🔹 10. Compliance Checklist for Indian Businesses

✅ Identify all cross-border digital transactions.
✅ Apply DEMPE analysis for intangibles.
✅ Maintain robust TP documentation.
✅ Justify intra-group service payments with evidence.
✅ Benchmark software/AI services with global comparables.
✅ Prepare for AI-driven TP audits by tax authorities.

🔹 Conclusion – The Future of Transfer Pricing

Transfer Pricing in the digital era is no longer about simple goods and services. It’s about algorithms, cloud services, and data value. For Indian companies, this means:

  • Increased scrutiny from tax authorities.
  • Need for stronger documentation.
  • Alignment with global best practices.

 Final Message: Transfer Pricing is evolving from a compliance exercise into a strategic business tool. Companies that adapt early, adopt robust systems, and stay transparent will not only avoid disputes but also gain investor trust.

Leave A Reply